IOQM 2024 UPDATES
RMO 2024 Qualification Cutoffs
Find out the official cutoff scores for RMO 2024 qualification and see if you've made the cut! Check your score . RMO 24 Cut Off Score.
Certificate and RMO Qualification Criteria for IOQM 2024
MTA has announced the Certificate Criteria for IOQM 2024.
For IOQM 2024, students can now receive up to two certificates: a National Certificate and a Regional Certificate.
-
National Certificate:
- Awarded to the top 10% of all students who appeared for the IOQM exam.
- The cutoff
is the minimum score needed to place within the top 10%, determined based on total participants.
-
Regional Certificate:
- Awarded to the top 10% of students in each region.
- The regional cutoff is the minimum score needed in that region for a certificate.
For more details, please refer to the Certificate Criteria
MTA has announced the RMO 2024 Qualification Criteria for IOQM 24
The Qualification Criteria for progressing from IOQM 2024 to RMO 2024 have been established by HBCSE.
For more details, please refer to the RMO Qualification Criteria.
IOQM 2024 Provisional Scores Available
The IOQM 2024 provisional scores are now available. Students can log in using their MTA registration number and date of birth to check their scores.
Check your score here: https://ioqm.manageexam.com
Important Note:
Score challenges will be accepted until 10th October 2024, 6 PM, through the official website.
The state-wise cutoff analysis will be announced soon. Stay tuned for updates!
19th September 2024
A total of 736 challenges were submitted regarding the provisional key. After thoroughly reviewing each challenge, the committee has decided that no changes will be made, and the provisional key will now be considered the final key. Below, we address some important and common challenges:
- Problem 8: The suggestion that the number could be negative is inconsistent with the problem’s phrasing and does not lead to other valid solutions.
- Problem 9: While the variables m and n are not explicitly stated to be integers, any alternative interpretation still fails to provide a finite number of answers, so no confusion arises.
- Problem 9: Although the word “pair” is not specifically described as “unordered,” the set notation “{…}” clearly indicates that we are considering unordered pairs.
- Problem 21: The typo of “Integer” as “Intenger” cannot reasonably cause any confusion.